Read other letters about this article
A very quick search of Thomas Legislative shows it thus: Obama 123 sponsored vs. Clinton's 150. Now, I don't have the time to pick through the previous Congress's legislation, but when one finds errors of fact is an obviously biased letter, one is forced to disregard the entire article as partisan demagoguery. Furthermore, in my perusal of the legislation it appears Clinton was the sole sponsor on significantly more legislation than Obama.
Obama is certainly a most dramatic and effective speaker but his ideas on several programs are significantly less than what Clinton offers this country. It is time for a woman President.