Read other letters about this article
I've never posted a response to a Salon article before but after reading Traister's historically 'neutral' commentary and suddenly coming across this ridiculously fawning, insipid and misleading article, I have to say: Salon is starting to really lose all credibility. Caught up in Bay Area - Clinton-endorsement fever or something? I don't expect to see Walter Cronkite-level objective newsreporting but for Christ's sake why do we have to have out-and-out propaganda for Clinton? Come on.
Really nothing that hasn't already been said by other posters, just saying my peace, move along, nothing to see here...