Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
It was written as if it was neutral but clearly had a slant.
Something like Clinton will win but just barely.
It kinda just rambled on with no end. Was it strategy analysis? Or what?
I mean I am fine with it as op ed but it seemed like a story that was all over the place. Trying to be even handed but well whatever.
It will be an interesting day.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox
