Letters to the Editor
-
@Anonymous
Didn't read the rest of my comment? If the tiger liked killing humans, that's one thing. But there's no evidence that she did. She was reacting to a bad human.
If you'd read farther, you'd see that I asked if there was any effort to find that out. From what I've read, it was just summarily decided that she would kill again. How do we know that? Do we automatically get out the gun and execute any human that kills? No, we don't. We put them in cages for decades, or life. Since that's exactly where the tiger was in the first place, why not simply put her back in an improved space, where such an incident won't happen again? Why the rush to bloodshed? How do two wrongs make a right?

