- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Is not impressing anyone, because it's full of sound and fury but signifying nothing.
http://factcheck.barackobama.com/
answers each of her questions about his record in detail.
And what about Clinton's record?
Why did she vote for the Patriot Act twice, both in its original form and in it's new form, and then take on Obama in the debate as if he had done something wrong? Why isn't she talking more about her Senate record. Why, according to this article is she funding a New Hampshire attack campaigns (fear campaigns not unlike a Rove attack...hmm.....) on Obama--and trying to make it look like it's coming from Edwards?
Follow the threads down on this site: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/06/553247.aspx
Why is Rupert Murdoch raising money for her in fundraisers? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12762092/
Clinton is attacking Obama to try to protect herself from scrutiny, but her plan seems to be to make people too frightened to vote for Obama, so in her evoking of fear to elicit power, she reminds me too much of the dark side of politics we already know.
