Read other letters about this article
I do not think I have ever been so disappointed in a publication that I once championed as being truly progressive. Why is no one writing about the lack of funding for John Edwards' campaign? Why is no one looking at what is an obvious reason for this lack of funding? Where have Clinton and Obama managed to find so much fatback for their larders? Could Edwards be underfunded because of his withering and accurate critique of the corporate choke-hold on this country? Why does the BIG MONEY go to Clinton and Obama? Could Salon be complicit in this anti-democratic, pro-capitalist effort to suffocate the life out of Edwards' campaign? Come on New Hampshire people -- follow the money and then see for whom and for what you are truly voting.