This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, January 5, 2008 12:00 AM

A Democratic donnybrook

The debate was rich in sound and fury, but did little lasting damage to unruffled frontrunner Barack Obama.

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, January 6, 2008 10:12 AM

    Obama represents nothing but platitudes

    As defiant as Hillary seemed last night, she was 100% right. Why does Obama represent change? Because he claims to? Because he doesn't have a lot of experience? Because he's African-American? The press is leaping on this idea that people are embracing change by choosing Obama, but all I have seen him do is talk about how he represents change, how the people "want a part in their government," or "want to know the government is listening." What does he stand for? Hillary answers questions in a straightforward, presidential way. She's the best candidate. And I'm disappointed that this country is still too sexist to see her potential.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
601

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
317

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon