This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, January 5, 2008 12:00 AM

A Democratic donnybrook

The debate was rich in sound and fury, but did little lasting damage to unruffled frontrunner Barack Obama.

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, January 6, 2008 07:45 PM

    @ Rambling Rose 22

    Obama says substantive things in debates -- when he has to. His website and his speeches are too platitudinous. His hope-schlock is working for him and he is sticking to it, at least for now. I think he may be rather hung up on his own oratory and charisma. You are right that, much of the time, there is no there there.

    I still think he is a good person and would be an effective president (as would Edwards or Clinton) but my fear is that, should he win the nomination, he would face a Republican opponent who does not pull his punches as the Democrats thus far have done. They have been pretty easy on Obama. I think the time has passed when a candidate can win on inspirational oratory alone, but I could be wrong.

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
352

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
208

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon