This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 3, 2007 12:00 AM

Ron Paul is a baby elephant

From around the country, Ron Paul's followers are descending on New Hampshire to go door-to-door for their man. But what do they really want?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, December 3, 2007 01:49 PM

    Paul has voted to continue the Iraq Occupation

    After the mid-term elections, I was somehow I was able to predict that Ron Paul would vote against the Democrats legislative attempts to end the Iraq Occupation. I am not happy that I was correct.

    Ron Paul voted against both appropriation bills that would have gotten us out of Iraq. One of them passed both houses but was vetoed by Bush. Both of the bills would have significantly curtailed Presidential authority.

    So, Paul continues to do what he has always done. When it counts, he votes with the Republicans. He finds some lame excuse.

    How many of his supporters are even aware of this? None that I talk to.

Most Active Letters Threads

732

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
298

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
191

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon