Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

48
Letters
Thursday, November 1, 2007 12:00 AM

The war on whistle-blowers

U.S. officials have long retaliated against employees who speak out, burying the dangers they expose. Now, Congress wants to give whistle-blowers greater protection -- but President Bush vows to stop it.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Friday, November 2, 2007 09:11 AM

Of Course Bush Opposes This

I just agreed to a whistle-blower settlement with DOI. The saga extended over a year and the real wrong-doers still hold their federal office despite malfeasance and misfeasance. I exposed fraud and violations of federal environmental law (http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=802). I was called a "subversive." in official correspondence. My wife, a temporary clerk with the same agency was fired for no cause with less than a day's notice. Retaliation, clear and venile.

The violations of law I witnessed were appalling, and I saw public money, millions, going to benefit a few wealthy individuals. Example: why did the Bureau of Reclamation dredge a new private boat marina in Nevada (Colorado River) with public funds in 2001-2002? Why are they today planning to redredge it at the demand of the resort owners? Could political contributions be involved?

That Bush opposes reform fits his desire to destroy government and US law, especially the hated environmental regulations.

Friday, November 2, 2007 01:14 PM

Congress: don't continue to fund OSC & MSPB

everyone this election cycle should ask their member of congress and senator whether they’ve personally participated in an agency oversight hearing in the past two years. if they can’t remember specifics, then vote their butts out of office – they’re simply not doing their job. the executive branch has proven that it can’t police itself and the funds it gets from congress. congress should take whistleblower case management away from OSC & MSPB by not re-authorizing their funding (it’s easy enough to do, just line them out), and give their staffs and funds to the GAO – who needs to go back to Accounting – actively auditing everyone involved in the three paths to power in DC: spending money, hiring people, and making regulations.

Friday, November 2, 2007 01:54 PM

compare and contrast

What Special Counsel Bloch says:

"I tried to file on behalf of Ms. Chambers, but her attorney with PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility) filed on her behalf before we could, and this deprived her of our ability to pursue her case."

What the law says:

"If an employee . . . seeks a corrective action from the Board under section 1221 . . . the Special Counsel may continue to seek corrective action personal to such employee . . . with the consent of such employee. . ."

5 U.S.C. 1214(a)(4)

Most Active Letters Threads

529

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
431

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
190

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
131

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?
104

Polanski moves from jail to ski chalet

The rapist director is granted bail, and one of his most vocal apologists celebrates

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon