This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, October 22, 2007 12:00 AM

Earth to PETA

Meat is not the No. 1 cause of global warming. Yet our diet is cooking the planet, and one surprising staple turns down the heat.

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, October 21, 2007 08:18 PM

    What?

    I've been saying this (and pissing people off) for years: if you eat a meat-based diet then deal's off - just shut your yap about being an enviromentalist. You do NOT need to eat meat. It's a choice, just like the car you drive or how many lights are on in your house.

    Yeah, you'd piss me off too with that arrogant, self-righteous crap.

    I think that the thing that most ardent advocates of vegetarianism/veganism for the environment's sake completely (and foolishly) ignore is that food is an intrinsic part of culture. If you're dedicated to doing everything that you can to reduce your impact on your environment, it's a great thing to completely switch over to tofu or tempura or algae or soylent green or whatever. Knock yourself out.

    But what would we really be giving up with a large-scale switch over to a completely plant-based diet? Our recipes, the food we enjoy, is no less important to our cultures than language or any other tradition. I'm not one to defend the cheeseburger as a daily meal, but why cast stones at a family that enjoys a turkey at Thanksgiving? Why look down upon anyone that would want to enjoy BBQ chicken or roast duck from an old recipe handed down from one's grandmother? And why would anyone suggest that eating meat as part of a local diet would be any worse than eating a plant-based diet consisting of apples from New Zealand, strawberries from Chile, and other foods shipped in from across the world?

    Furthermore, there are (pardon the pun) bigger fish to fry. Eliminating one plane trip that some household would take to Europe for vacation, for example, *completely* overpowers any change to diet. (About five tons per round trip!) Reducing our household electricity use in half? Same effect. And this is nothing when compared to the changes that could be made if many of our industrial (including agro-industrial) processes and commercial operations are fundamentally restructured.

    So... change the structure of the underlying systems. Work to make things local and/or sustainable in food production. Try to make wise choices in food selection. Reduce waste. And yes, reduce meat consumption! (Who really needs to eat a large steak for every meal, anyway?) But looking down upon anyone because of their food choices? Idiotic. It's cutting your nose off to spite your face, and a demonstration of class-based environmental elitism at its worst. It alienates most of the people that are needed to actually make an effective change, without actually making a large change in environmental impacts.

    And in the end, that kind of arrogance does *nothing* to save the planet.

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers
113

I survived Glenn Beck's Christmas spectacular

The preposterous showman brings his holiday book, and waterworks, to the stage and screen. Lights! Camera! Jesus!
106

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon