This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, July 3, 2007 12:00 AM

Hip, hip, CAFE!

Some Dems celebrate a new Senate bill to boost gas mileage. But it's premature to toast the end of our high-octane bender.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, July 4, 2007 04:21 PM

    Horsepower vs efficiency

    In the old days of muscle cars cars burnt lots of extra fuel. The extra fuel cooled the engine and allowed the engine to run at its most powerful fuel-air ratio. They got terrible mileage. Now with computer controlled engines, and also much better engine designs we can have efficiency and power at the same time. I read somewhere that a GM V-8 of the 1960's cost GM $25 to build. In todays dollars that would be maybe $200. I suspect that our much more complex engines of today cost more.

    Variable valve timing, which flattens the torque curve, allows efficient operation at low RPM, which reduces engine friction and pumping losses. Yet these same engines when revved to 6000 or more RPM produce gobs of power. So a modern engine with a six speed transmission can drive a car at 80 MPH at less than 2000 RPM, and by shifting down and revving up can deliver 250-300 HP with no efficiency penalty. Small cars of the '80's weighed around 2000 lbs; they now weigh over 3000, except for the very small cars now on the market. The engines of the'80's would get terrible mileage pushing todays (relative) behemoths.

    Those who are old enough can remember the Messerschmitts and BMW Isettas of the '50's. If they were out today with modern engine technology they would probably get 80 MPG in the city. And if you got hit by a modern sub-compact you would die.

    The Insurance Institute of Highway Safety has a web site that charts the death rate per million registered vehicles of almost all cars on the road. My Odyssey has one third of the fatality rate of a Suburban, for example, so size isn't everything. But a car can get so small that it is inherently hazardous to drive it. So we will have fairly heavy cars for the foreseeable future , but modern engine-transmission combinations and hybrid technology will sure help. I think we will have $10 gas within five years. Make your plans accordingly.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
588

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
314

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon