This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, July 3, 2007 12:00 AM

Hip, hip, CAFE!

Some Dems celebrate a new Senate bill to boost gas mileage. But it's premature to toast the end of our high-octane bender.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, July 3, 2007 07:23 AM

    Gas Tax is the only way to go

    Until gas taxes are raised so the inflation adjusted price of fuel takes a significant bite out our people's budget, why should we change our driving habits? If congress wan really serious about reducing oil dependence we'd match or exceed Europe's tax structure.

    I drive 8000 miles a year to get to work. At the 20 MPG my Sienna averages, I spend $1200/yr on gas and get the utility of being able to haul my three kids around, groceries, etc when it suits me. Overall, I drive about 15000/yr and spend rougly $2300/yr. In the grand scheme of things, it's a less important expense than my mortgage, property tax, food, travel, electricity, etc. Gas doesn't break the top ten of things I spend $ on. I could drive a Pious and save $1200/yr, but I'd give up the utility and safety features of the larger vehicle.

    It's no wonder the Pious isn't selling. If I truly cared about mileage/emissions, I could buy a Corolla, get 35-40 MPG and save $4-6K on the purchase price. If you can do basic math, there is no ecomonic reason to favor the Pious over a similar small car, say a Mazda 5. The Pious, is more a "look at how eco-friendly I am statement", the green equivalent of buy a McMansion to impress your coworkers.

    This weekend, I took a 900 mile roundtrip in my van with my family + in-laws. We do trips like this 3-4 times a year. What is better for the environment, 7 people in one van getting 25 mpg, or 7 people in two cars averaging 35 mpg?

    Tax me and I'll change my behavior. Put the taxes into mass transit that is accessible and goes where I need to go, & I'll use it. Until then, all a 35 mpg cafe does is create a mismatch between what people want and what the automakers have to sell.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
312

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon