This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, April 16, 2007 12:00 AM

University officials waited two hours to warn campus, students say

With at least 33 dead and 29 wounded, some ask why the campus wasn't shut down after an early-morning killing.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, April 18, 2007 02:29 PM

    I love how you people think I'm the only one who thinks this

    I know you would love to believe that I'm the only person in the entire world who thinks admin was at fault, but: please read the articles and talk to people who were on campus, like I have. Then spout off your nonsense about how no one deserves to know until 9:30 that people were killed on campus at 7:15. Forgive me if I believe the people who were there rather than you.

    The Salon article is right, and it's not the press who are saying the administration was slow and security lax: it's parents, it's VT kids, it's people who aren't sitting at their computers, like you are, deciding that kids deserve to wait two hours to know a)there was a murder and b)there's a murderer loose among them. Several students were interviewed saying that they didn't realize there was a murder on campus.

    And the people who were dense on Aug. 21 are the ones who didn't realize the campus was closed, evacuated and classes locked by 9 am. If anyone was in doubt there was a crisis at that point -- as one commenter claimed -- they're too stupid to live.

    Also, KStone, please cut it out with the personal, snotty comments, like "glad you weren't in charge" or "I guess you dropped your previous "not taking domestic violence seriously" angle, eh? "

    If you were able to follow a single argument past your own inane prejudices, you would see that it's still the same argument. I guess if you don't actually see the literal words "domestic dispute" you think it's not the same point. Throughout, I've been saying that campus security treated these two murders differently and kept them quiet because they thought it was a domestic dispute. They said that themselves. That assumption was wrong, they had no proof of a domestic dispute and IN ADDITION, even if they thought it was a domestic dispute, they should have acted on the only, actual thing they knew, which was: two people dead, murderer on the loose.

    Please, convince me some more that people shouldn't be told of murderers on campus. Because if you convince me, since I'm the only person who thinks security acted wrongly and inefficiently, you win the Internet!

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
407

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon