This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, February 16, 2007 12:00 AM

Why I had to quit the John Edwards campaign

During my brief tenure as blogmaster for a Democratic presidential contender, I experienced the right-wing smear machine firsthand

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:42 PM

    The Anatomy of a Fake Controversy

    Its bemusing, the “criticisms” from the naysayers. Ms. Marcotte got what she deserved because she said things that offended bigots? Because people who took what she said completely out of context - and continue to do so - were offended? Because people who hold a certain opinion about a year old alleged rape-case which hasn’t even gone to trial cannot stand somebody holding a different opinion? Because people cannot get over server problems? Yet they were the ones who read her blog, continued to read her blog, perhaps posted on her blog, and even maybe emailed her. This line of reasoning can be summed up by Daffy Duck yelling, “I say Duck Season. So shoot!”. Think she “got what she deserved” because of what she said? You got what you deserved for reading it in the first place. It should have ended there. Period, end of story.

    Ms. Marcotte, now that you’re airing your experience they are even more angry. Don’t you know that one is supposed to fall silent after attacks from Conservative zealots for daring to sassily put out a perspective that doesn‘t exaggerate the stature of straight, white, middle-class men who decide what it means to be “Catholic“ or “Christian“? Like a good woman who knows her place. So cue further disingenuousness that none of this has anything to do with her being a feminist woman, yup. All those letters and posts regarding her looks, how she needs to be “f*cked”, wishes that she is barren, and other sexually violent acts specific to the female body and experience are just the Devil playing tricks on us.

    Ms. Marcotte: You poked intelligently at sacred cows. You insulted and satirized - and threw back into their faces their words and ideas - people who use religion and wonderful people such as Jesus Christ to justify depriving others of human rights. Who, by apparently appointing themselves spokespersons for all Catholics (or any religion for that matter), are more bigoted than anybody for further marginalizing the experiences of religious people - Catholic or otherwise - who don’t hold bigoted, anti-gay, anti-woman, xenophobic views. You made fools of people who tried too much to be like Jesus, throwing themselves on crosses over supposed “scrubbing”, over things you didn't even say. This was yet another non-controversy and you called it.

    I say - enjoy.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
592

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
316

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon