- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Ms. Johnson, if you don't think an ethics committee comprised of 18 professional and community members who took the time to hear out Ashley's parents, meet her, and spend at least 2 hours in discussions of her case not an organized effort, I can't imagine what would be. Did you even think about what you wrote?
As a physician, I think Ashley's parents should be commended for taking the necessary steps to safeguard their daughter against a number of dangers. Primarily the one of becoming too physically large for them to care for, and hence having to be cared for by a steady stream of strangers.The difficulties inherent in developing a fully sexually mature body in the setting of a hopelessly infantile mind has been avoided as well. Now, she need never experience sexual assault, pregnancy, menstrual cramps, and has no need of invasive, frightening screening tests. I applaud her caregivers' creativity and courage.
As for the "slippery slope" thinkers, better hope that if you or your loved ones are ever in even remotely similar situations the decision makers are more open-minded, rational, and logical.
This is just another case where people who have no standing to comment on a situation feel they have a right to chime in. I call it "Fristian medicine" and it should be stopped in its tracks.
