Read other letters about this article
I don't see why this is even a controversy. Obviously, OBVIOUSLY, being held and carried around by her parents is a big part of a three-month-old's quality of life. Can anyone conceivably argue that someone with the mind o a three-month-old would be happier being pushed around in the vinyl-and-steel embrace of a wheelchair that she is unable to propel herself than being carried by her parents?
And what is this talk about sex and eugenics? Eugenics? As if a three-month-old could ever give consent to sex. How are the reproductive rights of someone with the mind of a three-month-old even an issue? There are only two ways this child could reproduce: Artificial insemination and rape.
The fact that Ashley's treatment will make things easier for her parents is utterly beside the point. The treatment makes Ashley's life better.