This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, December 1, 2006 12:00 AM

Who poisoned the KGB agent?

Only a state with a highly sophisticated nuclear program could kill a person with a radioactive toxin.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, December 1, 2006 09:16 AM

    The expert radiologist on Lehrer ruled out anti-static brushes

    They interviewed Nicholas Priest, a radiologist from Middlesex University, and he said that the anti-static brushes people are talking about here would be too hard to extract a usable quantity from.

    This is what he said:

    A third way of getting polonium would be to try and extract it from anti-static brushes, which are used in the photographic industry, and you would have about the right amount of polonium there, but it would be very difficult to extract. And these brushes are made so they're difficult to tamper with, and so they're safe.

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/july-dec06/poison_11-30.html

    Since he was a professional radiologist USING HIS OWN NAME, I believe hm over people posting on the Internet under completely made up names.

Most Active Letters Threads

523

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
415

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
185

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon