This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, November 4, 2006 12:00 AM

Abortion foes' dirty tactics

Advocates of a California "parental notification" bill accuse Planned Parenthood of protecting sexual predators instead of teen girls. But who is really breaking the law?

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, November 4, 2006 05:56 AM

    Their true agenda...

    ...is to stop Planned Parenthood from being able to provide health care to ANYONE. Their sole agenda is to see that any and all unplanned babies get born, no matter the consequences to those babies' parents. Remember: The most extreme Planned Parenthood foes truly believe that all hormonal birth control is a de facto abortifacient. And some of those folks believe that this country started to go downhill, morally, when it became legal to dispense condoms--to MARRIED PEOPLE(!). Yes, these folks want to send us all back to the Good Ol' Days of "Angela's Ashes," when Catholic parents couldn't (wouldn't?) plan their families, and children literally starved to death. But at least those kids got to be born (and baptized).

    Planned Parenthood has every right to sue these folks. And that's exactly what those folks WANT to have happen, because it's their intention to subpoena every confidential medical record and all personnel records in Planned Parenthood's offices, in the name of "discovery." We can well-imagine what illegal use to which they'd put that information.

    In California, we have a "safe haven" law that has the purpose of giving women who've given birth a safe way to "dump" their newborn babies at certain public facilities--an alternative that preserves their anonymity and has no legal consequences for them...or to whomever fathered their children. This law has saved hundreds of babies (and it COULD save hundreds more, if every girl or woman who wanted to hide the fact that she'd given birth would avail herself of this law). If these Planned Parenthood harassers were to be consistent in their POV, however, they'd surely be against the "safe haven" law, because it potentially allows adult men to father children by minors with impunity. I never saw those folks objecting to that law when it was being debated, and the reason is because they don't really care about minor girls--they only care that as many babies as possible get born. And when they've accomplished that goal, they'll set to work on ensuring that ever-more babies get conceived in the first place.

Most Active Letters Threads

405

I'm thankful I'm not President Obama

Backers deride Katrina-style negligence, haters hate him more each day. Can this presidency be saved? Of course
322

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
320

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
223

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon