He bought into the politics and the evil and now wants to collect the financial rewards of the talk show circuit and book sales. What a jackoff. I personally am an atheist and a democrat and the 2 are mutually exclusive. I use to be an independent until the Republicans put their lips of the tits of the religious neocon right and proved how incompetent they are. Our country has been set back 2 generations by the actions of this administration and the duplicity of assholes like David Kuo. I hope he gets cancer again and wastes away the fuck that he is. EVERYONE knew that this was going on who had any intelligence. Don't attribute very much intelligence to this neocon base, they are waiting for the fucking rapture.

I would like to say "who didn't see this coming?" But apparently, the Christian Right with their idol worship of George Bush didn't see this coming. And I knew when Bush was re-elected in 2004 that this would come back to bite him in the ass. He courted the Religious Right the way a slick player in a fancy car and nice threads seduces a woman that doesn't know better and then drops her after he gets what he came for. Now he won't return her phone calls. Poor thing. You thought he was different. But he wasn't. Just like all the others you've gone chasing. Christians have a long history of chasing the "gods" of power, wealth, and influence. Their God is a jealous and angry one which hates these affairs and promises destruction for the sin of idolatry. So no one who watches this should be surprised that these people are feeling about as used as a cheap whore. However, unlike the rest of us who might only have to live down the embarrassment of being fooled, the Christians also have to contend with their none-too-pleased Deity over this whole mess and pray that he'll be forgiving this time. For my part, I prayed that this day would come. Maybe now instead of calls for more worship of the "pastor-in-chief", nutbags like Falwell and Robertson will be calling on their followers to repent and humble themselves. That would be a welcome switch for all of us.

Growing up in Central Texas, I was exposed to one kind of Christianity. The kind that resulted in a teacher cramming my little sister's head on her desk and holding it down because she wouldn't bow her head for the mandatory school prayer to Jesus. The kind that had students ostrasizing me and calling me names because I wouldn't bow my head to the school prayer. The kind where ministers preached that God kills non-believers in brutal ways, a sermon that left me in terrified tears. The kind that had my four year old sister telling us we were all going to burn in hell if we were bad. The kind that told me that if we were poor, it was because we were not good people, so God was punishing us.

Then, thanks to my new stepfather, I was exposed to a different kind of Christianity. In his church, we learned tolerance and caring. We marched with the farmworkers up Congress Avenue in Austin, and held hands with black Baptists in the park to show our support for integration, even as others were murdering civil rights workers. We attended church events where poets read to us about justice and love, and we welcomed everyone into our church, no questions asked, no proofs of particular faith necessary, and no judgments made for anyone's past bad choices, just a desire to help them live a good life.

So there are different kinds of Christians, and Bush is allied with the first kind. I am glad Mr. Kuo found his heart with the second kind of Christian, like I did. I wish him the best, and appreciate that his willingness to describe his own journey.

Kuo states:"The problem is that Christians have been so invested in evangelizing politics that they have politicized their religion, and they've bought into an us-and-them mentality, so that frankly we -- they -- can no longer even communicate with people who happen to have different political views. Jesus sought out people who were prostitutes, outcasts and lowlifes. I fear that Christians are forgetting to invest in these very people and in the process isolating themselves by focusing too much on politics. I hope that by taking a step back we can give some of those hundreds of millions of dollars that are spent on attack ads, give it to the poor, give it to an after-school program, spend time with neighbors. As hokey as that may sound, it's what Jesus said to do, and I think it's more important right now than politics."

Utter nonsense.

I've been an active conservative evangelical for 25 years. What I've observed is that conservative Christians--both in leadership and especially at the grassroots--who are the most passionate and active in socially conservative politics are ALSO some of the ones who are the most passionate and active in compassion outreaches and ministries. Yes, there are many politically liberal evangelicals, like Kuo, who are involved in compassion ministries, and virtually all politically conservative Christians are thankful for that, and often partner with them (cf. World Vision). But . . . there are MORE politically conservative Christians who are involved in such ministries, both numerically and in terms of donated dollars and volunteer hours.

It's not just my observation.

If you do a survey of those denominations, individual churches, non-profit organizations, and individuals who are BOTH politically active AND heavily financially invested in compassion ministries (poverty alleviation, feeding programs, counseling, addiction recovery, etc.), you will find politically conservative Christians massively involved helping the poor and needy. The Southern Bapists are just a small example of this massive effort. And if you look at the operations of those ministries, you will see that although evangelism plays a role, no "conversion" is required to receive help such as food.

As always, there will be exceptions to this scenario, but the general picture I've painted is accurate. In general, politically conservative evangelical Christians have their priorities straight: evangelism, compassion, politics. On many issues, these three areas intersect (such as religious freedom, justice issues, etc.). And often, some evangelical leaders do indeed get dazzled and suckered. But not in general. In general, these three priorities remain.

Another Kuo fallacy: the demand for faith-based bucks by evangelicals.

The truth is that in general, the faith-based initiative never did sell well with top evangelicals. Some were on board. Many others were skeptical. When the money didn't come, most faith-based groups didn't care. They didn't want the strings that would have been attached to such funding. In that regard, Kuo is indeed naive, because this was well reported in the Christian media. There was never any massive push for the money; the demand was tepid.

Another Kuo fallacy:

He says Jesus would not care about "political" issues like abortion and the legal definition of marriage. So, I guess Kuo doesn't see the brutal dismembering of what even liberals agree is a human baby to be a "compassion" issue. I guess he doesn't see giving pregnant women an option to adopt out their baby and get the skills to climb out of poverty or destructive relationships as a "compassion" issue. I guess he doesn't see the statistical relationship between the sexual revolution's legal and cultural attack on traditional marriage and family and the increase in STDs, abuse, messed up children, a nose-diving lifespan and skyrocketing mental illness rate for gay people (especially in geographic areas where they are most "affirmed", such as San Francisco, New York, and L.A.), and other pathologies as a "compassion" issue. I guess he doesn't see this because part of the problem (and solution) involves "dirty" fields like law, public policy, and politics.

The fact is that politically conservative Christians do see all these as compassion issues. So they pour in volunteer hours, money for the poor and needy, and political activism where necessary into such causes.

And not to establish a theocracy (no reputable Christian leader advocates such a thing), but to have the freedom to serve others and express their viewpoint.

Maybe Kuo needs to take a fast from politics, but not from reading his Bible. That Bible shows that Jesus, who is God over all things, is very interested in using all avenues--including, but not limited to, civics--to advocate for compassion and justice. That's politics.

And hopefully, all the paranoid posters I've read regarding this article will get a grip. The big, bad evangelical monsters under your bed aren't there. We're out trying to live our lives, love our families, befriend our neighbors, help the poor, and persuade others of our ideas regarding freedom and justice. If that scares you, then you're scared of the 1st Amendment.