This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:00 AM

Getting beyond our airport security obsession

Confiscating corkscrews and tweezers didn't make us safer after Sept. 11. And banning liquids isn't going to make us safer now.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, August 10, 2006 06:19 PM

    Reaction is inevitable

    No one should be surprised at the security reaction to this event. However, I don't think it is driven by any analysis of whether banning liquids etc. really will reduce overall threat.

    Imagine you are an airline employee, or a government official, or a security "expert" and this issue is splayed all over the news. What if you don't make the obvious step of banning stuff like these terrorists were going to use -- and then an incident using these materials actually happens? Talk about a career-limiting event.

    The people in charge at airports have to do this now -- they'd be risking their jobs and maybe even risking jail if they didn't.

Most Active Letters Threads

600

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
437

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
206

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
147

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon