This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 5, 2006 07:12 PM

    Report on the real story: safeguarding our democracy

    Whatever you think of the legitimacy of the 2004 election, most of us can agree that two very disturbing things happened:

    1. Republicans "employed broad, methodical, illegal tactics" (as RFK Jr. phrased it), inappropriately attempting to influence election results -- from discarding valid voter registrations and provisional ballots, to deliberately targeting minority voters for intimidation, to neglecting to provide adequate voting equipment in good working condition; and

    2. The mainstream media made no real attempt to shed light on these abuses.

    So naturally, when a major article comes along (in Rolling Stone) to draw attention to these very real problems, exhorting millions of people to ask "why is this happening" and "how do we clean up the system," Salon responds by praising its author for thrusting these key issues into the national limelight, correct? Wrong.

    Instead you've given us a piece (complete with hysterical headline) that "debunks" two assertions that the author never made: that new evidence has come to light, or that evidence proves that Kerry received more votes in Ohio. "You can't prove that Kerry actually won" screams Manjoo for what must be the tenth time now.

    Folks, that's not the point. This problem is bigger than one state, or one election.

    The real story here is the lack of adequate protection for America's democracy. Our system is vulnerable to partisan attacks, ones with real potential to change the outcome of elections. The Republican party is taking advantage of that weakness, using underhanded tactics to keep Democrats from voting, or from having their votes properly counted -- and the mainstream media has been totally averse to investigating or reporting that when it happens.

    I had expected Salon to offer a serious examination of these problems. Instead, your article ignores them entirely and attacks straw men instead. I count on you for more than this, and I'm bitterly disappointed.

Most Active Letters Threads

532

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
431

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
192

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
187

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
131

Facebook, the mean girls and me

At 34 years old, I finally feel like a popular seventh-grader. How sad is that?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon