Read other letters about this article
This person obviously didn't even bother to read the originating article at rollingstone.com ...
Perhaps, but the dead-tree version of RS, which I read, does not have links, for obvious technological reasons. You have to take it on faith that Kennedy cites the sources fairly. And as Manjoo has pointed out, Kennedy cherry-picks the facts that suit his purposes while ignoring those that don't--all within the same report.
My point stands