This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.
By Farhad Manjoo

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, June 4, 2006 10:17 AM

    Why did Kennedy need Rolling Stone to publish his "evidence"?

    Rolling Stone is not exactly an unbaised publication. Why not Time, Newsweek, The New York Times, etc?

    Jann Wenner would publish a report that Bush drinks the blood of Muslim children each morning if he could find a crackpot who swore he saw it.

    I really don't know what happened in Ohio. But if Rolling Stone reports something first, and it's not about the new White Stripes album, then I am already skeptical.

    —FloydRose123

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
414

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
Glenn Greenwald Read article
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
By David Sirota Read article
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
By DOUG FERGUSON, Associated Press Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon