This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 3, 2006 07:58 AM

    Scratching my head...

    ...over this piece. I'm not sure I understand Manjoo's purpose in writing it or Salon's purpose in publishing it--unless they're just collecting up the benjamins.

    Do they imagine that readers will be unable to find suitable criticism of RFK's Rolling Stone story somewhere other than at Salon? Or do they simply want to "scoop" the Washington Times and Fox News?

    A responsible publication goes to press with a factually comprehensive and analytically muscular story on a topic of this importance--or not at all.

    Perhaps this is meant to stir up the crowd a little and boost traffic. I guess that's part of the business, but it doesn't make it any less disappointing to encounter such insubstantial "journalism" at the generally creditable Salon.com.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
370

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
322

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon