This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.
By Farhad Manjoo

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 5, 2006 10:46 AM

    Salon Cred

    Salon has no credibility on this issue. Your coverage of it has been a source of frustration from the beginning. Manjoo jumped on this from the get go, well before much of the data was gathered and presented. He was vehement from the start in denouncing any particulars and merits of the argument as well as those who defended it. Manjoo is not the fellow Salon should repeatedly allow to comment on the issue. Salon owes its readers a more evolved, less rabidly biased discussion of Kennedy's presentation of the data.

    —richartman Read richartman's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

739

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
357

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
232

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
Alex Koppelman Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon