This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.
By Farhad Manjoo

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:40 PM

    Fruit of the poisonous tree

    1. Bush stole the 2000 election.

    2. Bush "won" the 2004 election by one state, which he won by 136,483 votes or 2.5%.

    3. Bush would not have won Ohio but for the fact that he was the incumbent.

    4. Bush stole the 2004 election.

    Q

    —Steve Goldberg Read Steve Goldberg's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
652

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
322

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
By Juan Cole Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon