This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, June 2, 2006 11:14 PM

    Something I don't understand

    Manjoo's example of how a 56 percent average response in a Bush district could still mean Kerry voters were over-represented does not make sense to me. If a district yielded a vote of 80 percent or more for Bush, and 53 percent of Bush voters were willing to respond to the survey, it would take a lot more than 59 percent of Kerry voters to yield an average of 56 percent, since Kerry voters are such a small minority. For example, if the split were 80-20 for Bush, then almost 70 percent of Kerry voters in the district would have to participate to give the 56 percent. What am I missing here?

Most Active Letters Threads

672

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
439

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
196

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon