This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 3, 2006 05:05 PM

    That's exactly the point.

    Bush should have been beaten by at least a 10 point margin and it is the fault of the DEMOCRATS that it didn't happen. And stop bellyaching that it means the Democratic Party needs to become more radical. The Democratic Party needs to become merely competent.

    -- Anonymous

    That's exactly the point. Had so many citizens not been denied the right to vote, perhaps Bush would have been beaten by at least a 10 point margin, but we'll never know because of the tactics of the Republican Party.

Most Active Letters Threads

672

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
439

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
196

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon