This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Was the 2004 election stolen? No.

In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 5, 2006 05:01 AM

    You reap what you sow.

    Whether the 2004 election was stolen or not is less important than the fact that the 2000 election almost certainly was. Given what happened in Florida in 2000, it was incumbent upon the Republicans to go out of their way to make sure any irregularities in 2004--perceived or real--were thoroughly and publicly investigated by an independent, non-partisan body.

    The worst harm Bush and co. have done to the country (and this is saying a lot!) is to grossly undermine the public's confidence in the process of voting itself. Not to mention failing to fix its obvious flaws, like electronic machines that leave no paper trail. Now, whenever there's a close race, the losing side will bitterly and loudly complain that it's 2000 all over again, tainting everything about the new administration.

Most Active Letters Threads

454

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
114

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
110

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon