This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, February 27, 2006 12:00 AM

Colonel of truth

Former Bush insider Lawrence Wilkerson blasts Dick Cheney's "paranoia" -- and says Cheney and Rumsfeld are to blame for Abu Ghraib.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, February 27, 2006 09:42 AM

    Where was he?

    Others have said this, but Wilkerson learned of Abu Grahib in the Spring of '04. So where was he during the long summer and fall that followed? I can't salute this man's courage. It's too late.

    Another point:

    "But Wilkerson said bogus intelligence isn't his principal reason for coming forward -- it's the use of American forces to torture prisoners in the war that it launched."

    Am I correct in inferring that Colonel Wilkerson feels greater loyalty to the military as an institution than to the Constitution? Just as his former boss feels a greater obligation to the Bush clan than he does to the country. Wilkerson's sense of shame should only be a hair less than Powell's.

    Shame on them both.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
573

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
309

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon