This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, February 3, 2006 12:00 AM

Europe's cartoon jihad

Explosive caricatures of Mohammed saw little fallout in Scandinavia, but will they unleash a new wave of riots in France's restive Muslim enclaves?

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, February 5, 2006 01:53 AM

    Power ...and Submission

    There has been a lot of discussion about trying to frame the cartoon issue as "Freedom of Speach" versus "Religious Law" or some variation on this them (Enlightenment viewpoint of self-critism versus Respect for religious sensitivities). These may be side issues or good arguing points, but what this whole controversy is about is just ....Power. Power to intimidate, power to silence, power to dominate. The same as you see in the middle east against choice, against women, against foreign ideas and beliefs.

    To summarize and to put things into perspective - This whole issue started when a Danish Newspaper requested cartoonists to draw pictures of Mohammed after the editor found out a woman author could not get anyone to draw pictures in a children's book on the life of Mohammed due to fear. The idea was to show that pictures could be drawn. This was in September. Danish Imams protested and began circulating the pictures in the Middle East with "enhancements" - ie, additional pictures that were not in the publication that were truly offensive - pigs heads on the Prophet and so forth. (All this informaton was presented on a recent (Feb 4) BBC Hardtalk program with the Danish Editor and the Imam in question)

    Now we have embassies burned in Damascus and the cartoonists in hiding and people carrying "Behead those who Insult Islam" in London. And lots of Danish Flags burned (so much for respect for Christian symbols too - there is a white cross on that flag)

    But back to the point - this whole issue was set up to inflame the Muslim world one more time against "injustice" from the West. To move the "acceptable criticism" point further down the field and to insure that any issue related to middle eastern politics or behavior is a closely intwined with Islam as possible. This muzzles the critics due to fear of a similar outburst and gives the "religious elders" the whip hand in threatening to stir up a similar tempest. And if you protest - why, then you must be anti-Islamic!

    Power ....and Submission. This is the great game in the middle east and it is being played out on your TV set. Watch as the debate is shifted to "sensitivity" and "respect" away from "challenge and defend". The question really is, when will someone say "Not Here!"?

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
588

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
314

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon