Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
From his lofty perch on the sidelines, the ethically challenged former speaker denounces corruption in politics.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • Newt's Revised Seating Plan

    Way Newt figures it, Big Jack is gonna have to ride up back of the plane from now on.

  • Newt the toad

    Anyone who's been awake the last 15 years remembers Newt's bullshit. Mr Moral needs to re-read his own biography and ask his wife(3rd?) just what kind of ethical man he is. All you need to know about the scumbag that want's to be president is what his ex-wives have to say about him. Do some research on this subject and see if the information doesn't send you into dry heaves everytime you see his fat, arrogent face. Don't worry Newt, just keep your chins up you slimy piece of shit.

  • Sorry Newt...no go...

    You've had more than enough shots at proving that you have some integrity, and you've failed, miserably and publicly, time and time again.

    There is no such thing as a minor lapse of integrity...

    You either have it, or you don't, and you, Newt, don't.

  • Newt finds Jesus, again

    I saw this embile on TV the other night and thought my brain was malfuntioning. Could this intelligent and reasonable man speaking with such integrity be the same slimy bastard we had all learned to hate? Indeed, I could only conclude that indeed Newt had found Jesus and had become a new man.

  • The Real Gingrich Shocker! - His record is clean.

    Letter to the Editor

    January 10, 2006

    Salon.com

    Dear Editor:

    In Michael Scherer’s piece ("Newt: I'm shocked, shocked by Abramoff scandal!" – Salon.com - January 2006), he falsely asserts that former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was required to "pay a $300,000 penalty” for “misusing nonprofit organizations for political purposes, personally benefiting from political contributions and giving false statements to ethics investigators.”

    Mr. Scherer should have checked the facts first. Democrats filed 84 politically motivated ethics charges against Speaker Gingrich. All of them were found to be without merit. The last three were dismissed on October 10, 1998. The fact is, not a single ethics charge filed against Speaker Gingrich was ever found to be based in fact - not one.

    During the investigation into the bogus charge of “misusing nonprofit organizations for political purposes,” a letter responding to an inquiry by the Ethics Committee prepared and filed by a Gingrich lawyer did contain an inaccuracy. When Gingrich learned about the discrepancy, he personally accepted responsibility for the misstatement, corrected the record, and agreed to reimburse the Ethics Committee for the cost of that investigation.

    The voluntary reimbursement did not stem from the phony charge, but was paid because of the error made by counsel during the investigation - an investigation that concluded no wrongdoing by the Speaker whatsoever and was dismissed by the bipartisan Ethics Committee as was the case in all 83 of the other charges. It was specifically not a penalty according to the Ethics Committee agreement.

    The fallout in the case resulted in an IRS investigation and a Federal Court case. Ultimately, Speaker Gingrich was cleared of any wrongdoing by the bipartisan Ethics Committee, the IRS, and a Federal Judge.

    So it is simply wrong to mislead readers by suggesting that Speaker Gingrich paid a fine, misused nonprofit organizations or personally benefited in any way from political contributions. The facts show that he took responsibility for a single error during the investigation and reimbursed the committee from his personal funds making him extraordinarily well-qualified to be an outspoken critic on the current and very real ethics scandal.

    Best regards,

    Rick Tyler

    Communications Director and Spokesperson

    Gingrich Communications

    Speaker Newt Gingrich

    540-338-1250

    RickTyler@newt.org

    www.newt.org