I think it's great that the difference in preparation was laid out so clearly that it's obvious we're being sold a false sense of convenience. However, thinking about it from the convenience angle adds a couple more steps to the recipe:
Homemade
1. Boil water
1.5 Measure pasta
2. Add pasta
3. Cook pasta
4. Grate cheese
4.5 Measure amount of cheese (maybe this is 3.5?)
5. Drain pasta
6. Add pat of butter and stir
7. Sprinkle with grated cheese
8. Serve
So there are actually three steps that you have to do with homemade that you don't have to do with Annie's, two of which include simple math. (Yes, I'm skipping the steps for measuring water, milk, the pat of butter, etc. because they're the same in both situations.)
I'm certainly not sticking up for Annie's; I'm just trying to understand what makes Annie's attractive. And I find it fascinating that the idea that Annie's saves you time (i.e.: is more convenient) doesn't actually hold water when you actually stop and think about it.
More to the point, I wonder what this kind of marketing mojo could achieve were it turned from the dark side (so to speak) and applied to important issues like the climate crisis...issues which form the subtext behind a lot of these kinds of purchases.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox