Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
After a close-up of her face appeared on the Drudge Report, Hillary Clinton was found guilty of -- horrors! -- aging.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • Brightstar's Latest Prophesy

    Thank you Brightstar for warning us of our impending doom at the hands of the capitalist pigs. I am glad you think Hillary is different, but still think you should have that talk with your mom. You have my vote for the next Nostradamus award. You see so much further into the future than the rest of us it's scary.

  • Anonymous 02:58 PM

    Ankles are bone structure. There is not much that can surgically be done about ankles, but I suggest that you request each male candidate send you a photo of his ankles so you can be sure they don't offend you before you actually cast your vote. It is nice to know that you are focused upon these make or break issues.

    America is in good hands with voters like you.:P

  • Would that it were only the skin......

    Senator Clinton does, indeed, look older in the unflattering photograph. It is not the "bad" picture which is telling -- it is thousands, if not millions, of images of her which, apparently successfully, manage to hide that condition. If she is unwilling to campaign "as she is" in appearance, then there is reason to make the comparison and conclude, not that she is old, but that she is as misleading in her public appearance as she is in her public comments, speeches, and, most of all, advertisements. And the same criticism/comparison is made of every male candidate! Flattering images of the men in their own advertisements and appearances are matched by distinctly unflattering ones broadcast by their opponents. Amazingly, Hillary's supporters have now decided there is another message -- her opponents must dislike older women and, therefore, she is now a victim. As it is said, "tough.......luck." She puts on the makeup!!!

  • I'm not crazy about Hillary...

    ...but she looks fine. It's not like she was photographed going out without her mascara and five hundred pounds of makeup.

    It's almost as if people were being asked by the media to be idiots. I understand people being nervous about "secondary sexual characteristics" in a would-be president. But aren't wrinkles a sign of wisdom and experience? Or did I get the wrong memo at school?

  • dumbulb...I mean, brightstar...

    These two "hunks" of manhood are not arguing about Clinton's politics. Like all insecure men faced with intelligent women, they go for the looks issue. Besides your Johnny One-Note screed, what's your point?