Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
State proposals to ban pit bulls reflect society's worst fears and prejudices. As the Michael Vick scandal has made clear, it is humans and not the dogs who are the criminals.
  • It puzzles me that there are people who always want to kill SOMETHING.

    I am outraged at dogfighting. I intensely dislike the occasional gang-type I see hanging around with a pit as an accessory. I am infuriated by the callous treatment and brutal abandonment of these animals.

    However, I am beginning to wonder how much REAL difference there is between people like Micheal Vick and people who are eager to see pit bulls killed -- because that is what a breed ban would mean. More animals killed than the appalling number we already see euthanized at our local animals shelters. When I lived a a city of forty thousand plus, I once heard someone explain that from 2,000 to 3,000 dogs and cats were put to death every month because they had become lost and not reclaimed or abandoned outright.

    I know that there are people who claim that dogs do not have "souls." Frankly, I am not sure people do. However, if we were comparing canine decency to human decency, I would vote for the dogs every time.

    Where is the decency of adding thousands more dogs (pits) to the number of destroyed animals in our nation -- especially when death and injuries by pit bulls is a statistically minor problem compared to many others that plague us?