Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
With raves for her book dissecting modernist marriages and a hot new journalism job at NYU, has feminism's enfant terrible finally grown up?
The letters thread is now closed.
  • if you want to say she's not a true feminist fine but I think it would be in your political interest

    to create a third category other than people who agree with you about everything and Ann Coulter. Have you learned nothing from Ralph Nader and the 2000 election. You've had lots of time and more evidence than anyone could of imagined to help you figure it out.

  • not in the interest of "true liberals"

    The corollary is that if you find someone, or some group, that insists on that behavior, insists on demonizing people that disagree with them as some sort of "anti", or some other, than you can reasonably ask yourself if that person or group is truly liberal, or truly progressive.

    the soc.feminism faq lists the following different types of feminism:

    Amazon Feminism

    Anarcho-Feminism

    Cultural Feminism

    Erotic Feminism

    Eco-Feminism

    Equity-Feminism

    Feminism and Women of Color

    Individualist, or Libertarian Feminism

    Lesbianism

    Liberal Feminism

    Marxist and Socialist Feminism

    Material Feminism

    Moderate Feminism

    Pop-Feminism

    Radical Feminism

    Separatists

    Are you telling me that Katie Roiphe fits into NONE of these categories?

    Feminism has a rich history of women and men of different philosophies coming together and discussing the issues. Why is it now that we all must fit within one narrow philosophy or risk being called an anti-feminist?

    What sort of organizations force such strict ideologies, speech and thought on their members? Thriving organizations, or dying ones?

  • As a ph.d. candidate

    can you back up your claim that there is no theory of social change in Roiphe's formulation of 'feminism'?

    I suspect she would not agree.

    Are you sure that no other forms of feminism and no other feminists reject victimization?

    I would think Wendy Kaminer (author of I'm Dysfunctional, You're Dysfunctional: The Recovery Movement and Other Self-Help Fashions who has written in Salon), and Cathy Young (also a former Salon writer) and even Camille Paglia (Salon writer) and many other feminists would all disagree with you.

  • Everywoman Feminism

    I know this letter will be lost in a sea of words, from the Rebecca Traister Pom Pom Squad (tm) hollerin' about Duke and Dad's rights and the thinly veiled catrastration agenda of NOW to the angry grrls who get all of their feminism from blogs, and proudly believe in whatever the loudest Down With Patriarchy pundit believes without question. This participatory media trend is certainly amusing for a voracious reader and armchair sociologist such as myself, and I tip my tea cup to all of you for providing me hours and hours of coffee break entertainment

    Feminism has been of great interest to me recently, or at least the myriad definitions, insinuations, assumptions and "camps" that seem to have popped up since I worked for Planned Parenthood or campaigned for female politicians in college. I've learned that I was part of some sort of new wave of feminism, and that I've come and gone.

    This, of course, came as a bit of a shock.

    Being a rational sort, maybe not as educated/enlightened as some of my sisters on the coasts, I think we've all gotten kind of off track. It's much easier, in these days of fighting to be seen in the endless internet, to cut down an opposing idea with a snarky verbal eyeroll than to really look at what the opposition is saying.

    Ms. Traister and Ms. Roiphe both are from my generation, and frankly I admire both of them for their passion and position to speak their minds. I think they are probably more similar, at the core, than either would admit, but I suppose that may be part of my beef. When I read these aricles/blog entries/books, here in my fairly modest home in the middle of America's heartland, what strikes me over and over again is how bloody different all these women's lives are from mine; and how more extreme voices such as theirs are shaping an entire country's worth of feminism. The majority of women in the US are a lot more like me than like these women that are increasingly becoming our voice.

    I'm here to speak up for the Everywoman Feminist. Those of us that are more worried about how we're going to afford gas for our crappy cars and put money away so we don't starve when we're old than whether or not someone who believes something different than we do said so publicly. Those of us who believe not all men are responsible for the actions of a few assholes, and should be innocent until proven guilty of assholery. Women who know men and women lie, cheat, hurt, love, create and enrich equally, and equality requires us to be responisible for our own behavior, no matter our gender, race, religion, IQ, political party, sexual preference, net worth or other way we've managed to sort and categorize ourselves over the years. The practical realists among us who are ever so fully entrenched in the real world.

    Our first order of business, as a newly formed branch of feminism, is to call for a moratorium on any woman judging any other woman for her choices, as long as they're legal and don't hurt anyone. Picking on each other for being homemakers or strippers or executives or socialites isn't helping anything, is it? What empowers me isn't going to empower you. That's the great thing about women, we're all remarkably different from each other.

    Our second order of business is to stop holding a grudge against men just because they're men. We're blessed with a generation of menfolk who were raised by smart, independent women. While I can't speak for all men, I'm surrounded by guys who chip in on housework, cook like master chefs and support the women in their lives like champs. They deserve a lot of credit, and they don't get it.

    Now that we're all getting along, our third order of business is to stop using gender as an excuse for any behavior, in any circumstance. If anything, we're flawed simply because we're human, gender - and a multitude of other pre-mentioned categories - has nothing to do with any of it.

    Our movement isn't going to burn our bras, or get cute t-shirts or anything. We're going to keep going to work and cooking dinner and balancing the checkbook and reading Salon, but we're going to do it knowing we've stopped wasting all of our extra energy on outrage! over silly stuff.