Letters to the Editor
This letter is associated with the following article:
-
Dread Scott!
From the perspective of the law, this ruling was an abomination. Unfortunately most people will support or denounce the ruling based on their “choice” perspective. That perspective should not have been relevant to this ruling. The ruling should have been based on points of law, and the issue that laws should be well written and clearly defined. That was not the case. Morality issues were used to justify the law rather than analytic thought.
In my opinion the law in question is written in this manner, “It is illegal to do bad things.”
After emotions run their course and law analysts calmly dissect this ruling, they will be aghast and embarrassed at the amateurism displayed by the majority justices.