Letters to the Editor
-
Feminists giving men permission not to be good to women anymore
Allegedly, everything that emanates from women has to be "good" or "improving" -- few people see the value in fighting for freedom of choice. The idea that women have to be virtuous in everything they do is antiquated -- why does feminism have to procude only what fits into a narrow definition of "'benefit"? What's wrong with it producing more orgasms, more travel, more freedom to do what you want? That's what I support.
Many men are constantly castigated for not being 'good' to women.
What is good for women is good for men too.
Men can also have more freedom to do what they want.
so I guess, this means men can do as they please and not bother being 'good' anymore to women.
I agree with you then.
Note to Mr. Dixon:
Don't let these twisted, manipulative cold blooded lizards throw you from your quest to become a FREE MAN. You are one of the few sensitive, aware, smart men who understands how perverted Feminism is, which is why you are under attack. Take it as a lesson not to bother engaging them in their perverted narcissistic degenerate war against men, humanity, and life.
-
HOW TO UNDERSTAND FEMINISM
The extreme self-pity is unattractive, and I'm not talking about future potential romantic partners here.
translation: you are a man, hence you serve our feminist needs. feminists need not concern themselves with lowly men's needs.
You have overshared. Many of your comments leave the impression that you are extremely bitter and, to put it mildly, a little unbalanced emotionally.
translation: you are a man, hence you ave no right to complain, especially to us feminists who only concern ourselves with OUR needs, never mind what we say about wanting to be equals to men and supporting men's needs too. That line about supporting men is just marketing patter to get you men to buy into our lies.
The diatribes against women in general are not rational and are a little disturbing. Any employer or prospective employer could reasonably conclude from what you have written that you pose a risk to workplace harmony, at the very least. Looking over what you have written, am employer would have some justification in considering you a bad risk all around.
translation: because I disagree with you, I am calling you irrational. furthermore, I will scare you to get you to stop giving witness to how women are, because after all, we feminists have already decided we are right and men are wrong. so good luck, mr. male, but you are on the losing side, we will do as we please and you men will take the punishment without complaint. Thanks, been fun. remember to smile sweetly for us women or else we'll PUNISH YOU even more.
-
by the way, brightstar, I'm a male
I'm the second Anonymous you quoted. I'm not a woman. I work in labor relations. My advice to Louis, about toning down his comments, applies equally to you.
Fair or not, the words you post here and elsewhere can be used against you. I'm not arguing for or against your point of view -- though I personally disagree with it -- just saying you have to think hard before you push the "send" button.
There's a common saying: Don't send any email you wouldn't want printed in the New York Times with your real name and address at the bottom. Doesn't matter if you use a pseudonym or go by "anonymous," as I do. I would amend that saying with this piece of advice: Don't send any email you wouldn't want attached to your resume.
-
Don't send any email you wouldn't want attached to your resume.
If this were taken literally the only thing it would be possible to discuss would be the weather. I agree that almost anything of substance that can be said has potential negative repercussions unless it is said anonymously.
-
if showing evidence that you don't like men disqualified women from being hired
men certainly wouldn't have to worry about workplace competition from women.
-
Louis, i'm still unclear on why YOUR opinions should be the rules for EVERYONE
LeCastor,
Yep, considering everything that life consists of, orgasms are shallow. If what's between your legs is that important then it's no wonder women think staring at it in a mirror brings "vagina wonder."
WEll, Louis, you can see that we disagree on how important sex is. I think most people would weigh in on my side, but why not let everyone pursue what they think is important instead of imposing your opinions on them? If some men and women think sex is the important thing in the world, and the way they want to pursue it is by having sex with many people, why should you or society tell them that they should get married and have children and move to the suburbs?
I believe children have a right to a childhood (a time of innocence when they don't have to deal with this kind of stuff) so to suggest parental attitudes should focus on adult concerns is pornographic in itself. (Hello Jon Benet Ramsey) Whatever.
As you are well aware, every generation, there's people screaming that children have a right to a childhood and that society is going down the tubes. Just think of the resistance there was to women wearing pants in high schools. I think children have a right to a childhood, but again (1) each family, within legality, decides what that means (when to start discussing politics, whether TV will be involved, etc.), (2) not everything has to be safe for children. Even the Supreme Court has acknowledged this -- 10pm to 6am (i think), everything on TV and radio doesn't have to be kid-friendly. Adults have a right to adult discussions, adult entertainment and it shouldn't have to be compeltely secret, late at night. (3) childhood is important, but between Janet Jackson's tit, and the gender wage gap, i think the gender wage gap is more important, you catch my drift?
If you don't understand that then there's nothing else for me to say. You women can have your crusade without me and, I gather, most other men too.
Don't be so bitter.
As you point out, there's porn, and prostitutes, and enough stupid girls that any man can convince to fuck and then make walk home for laughs.
"What's love got to do with it?"
Even love involves orgasms. Love isn't rainbows and lollipops and flowers all the time -- it's an adult endeavour.