- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
what in the world do SAHMs want from us?
Okay, I just asked it. But here's the reason why: feminism has made sure that women can enter the workforce mostly on their own terms, that women can leave bad marriages (although as some complain, no longer with fat alimony payments... sigh), that they should not have to face abuse or harrassment either at home or at work, that they can vote, that they can control their own reproduction, that there's at least some societal pressure on men to help with housework & childrearing *even when they're also the sole breadwinners*, and yet it's never enough. Feminism is and has always been primarily a movement promoting economic & political (which are mostly the same these days), as well as professional & educational, empowerment for women. You can certainly be a SAHM and a feminist, but a lack of meaningful activity in the aforementioned areas does tend to make it hard for feminism to address whatever your concerns might be, under the circumstances. And those of us who are not SAH have diminished power because of your absence. We can agitate for professional equality, but many businesses know perfectly well that if they hire ten men & ten women, eager & well-qualified 27-year-olds, what their retention rate will likely be in five years or so, and they act accordingly.
In an individual household, a couple can negotiate terms in which all contributions to the family unit are equal, etc., but in the outside world there's nothing even remotely equivalent, and for good reason. Feminism cannot overthrow capitalism entirely, especially when our effective (meaning, as I said, those with economic/political clout) numbers diminish as women decide to opt out of the system. There's basically no incentive for anyone participating in the system to change it, because the people who are most interested in change have already decided to opt out, and those who would like change but have stayed behind now have less negotiating power.
So I think we're really at an impasse. I'd love for employment to be flexible enough for both men & women for real progress to occur (first step, universal health care), but we have neither a critical mass of women nor adequate support from men to make that a reality. The women still out there aren't able to transform the world enough to lure you back into the workplace; there aren't enough of us with serious clout. If you just want an attagirl for staying home, here-- and take a pat on the back too. But the truth is that where you are right now really isn't our business any more (outside of actual abuses), and I'm honestly not sure what else feminism is supposed to be offering you at this point, since we've basically done all we can to make home life at least a bit less unpleasant for women. And on days when this particular debate is at the forefront, I often think that feminism should basically pack it in, because we seem to have reached the limits of what women as a group are willing to do for equality.
