This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:00 AM

My lunch with an antifeminist pundit

Kate O'Beirne, author of the new book "Women Who Make the World Worse," says most women don't want the things feminists are fighting for.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, January 16, 2006 07:10 PM

    Here I am, tear me apart.

    What liberals don't realize is that many of these right-wing pundits are not scholars or authors who are trying to have a reasonable discussion about issues. They're like chess masters. They know the opening, the middle game, the end game. They are not there for a friendly discussion; they are there to win. And not just to win but to vanquish with scorched-earth ruthlessness. For every move you make they have a pre-planned, pre-studied counter-move. For every statistic you have they have 20 statistics, all memorized, and it would take you a month just to figure out where all their statistics came from. They know all your arguments before you even open your mouth. And they have a hundred pre-packaged refutations for anything you might say.

    It's time for liberals to understand what's going on. There is a culture war. It's just that we don't act like it. When some poor liberal goes up against O'Beirne it's like a minimum-wage security guard with a nightstick going up against a Navy SEAL with a submachine gun. The author of this article says that when Kate O'Beirne came up against a former head of NARAL that "it was a bloodbath." No shit it was a blood bath. That's what O'Bierne DOES. That's what she trains for.

    When these "discussions" happen in a public venue it makes the liberal look dumb and inept. What we have to realize is that these things are not discussions. They are combat. The conservative hit-person is not there to discuss. He or she is there to kill you and mount your scalp on a hundred right-wing blogs. Here's what the American Enterprise Institute said about the match-up:

    "Watching the Kate vs. Kate debate on Meet the Press this past Sunday--it was our own Kate O’Beirne vs. Kate Michelman, formerly of NARAL Pro-Choice America--how out-of-date the latter's rhetoric seemed, how diffuse and filibustering her language was, over against the precision, citation of telling facts, and self-confident argument of Kate O'Beirne."

    http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.23678/pub_detail.asp

    Bloodbath indeed. The tragedy is that we liberals participate in it, we run to it. The early Christians at least had to be *thrown* to the lions. We liberals walk into the lions -- "here I am, rip me to shreads." If you're going to confront the lions you need to be a lion. And where are the liberal lions?

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
260

A new report questions "suicides" at Guantanamo

Why is the Obama DOJ attempting to block judicial review of three highly suspicious deaths?
224

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon