Letters to the Editor
-
Wow. You people sure do assume a lot.
I love how people here always infer a whole mess of things about a LW based on their letter, and by "funny," I mean "laughable."
It's as if you have to make up arguements in order to immediately refute them. I'll have to remember that. Next time someone tells me they don't like broccoli, I'll twist it around to mean they are a child rapist, and tell them how dispicable they are.
A: I don't like broccoli.
B: Oh, you don't like brocolli, huh? Why? Because they look like little boys with green puffy heads? Huh? Huh? What are you trying to hide from us? That you like to rape little boys? You people discust me! I hope they lock you up and throw away the key!
A: ...?
Yeah, clearly the LW harbors a dark, secret attraction for the woman he works with and is only upset because of the shame he feels over it. Brilliant! Bravo!
Give me a break. Why don't y'all just address what you know to be true and leave the asinie assumptions to the "you hate freedome because you disagree with me" types?