This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 18, 2006 12:00 AM

My boyfriend freaked out because I had a threesome

It happened before we were together, but he can't handle it and he's being a real jerk.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:02 PM

    Good question, Anon

    but was there an affirmative finding that women WERE influenced or was it just assumed that because there was no finding that resistance to being influenced was causing breakups that women were being influenced when in fact it was also possible that women were NOT being influenced but that that was not causing the relationships to break up

    This is actually a good question, largely because I'm going six different directions with it. Briefly:

    Because the layman's news blurbs do not (and cannot) lay out methodology, I did follow up my initial interest in Gottman's "press," and my layman sense is that the methodology is sound.

    It seems to me your question would fall under the heading of "tracked variables" and had your suggestion of "uninfluenced women make for solid relationships" carried any water, I'm pretty sure Gottman would have been all over it. He's meticulous that way.

    Investigate his research. I may disagree with some of his viewpoints, but the research is sound.

    Your basic notion appears to be that men will put up with all kinds of shit for the sake of sex, and that women will not. What you appear to be missing is that women will put up with a great deal of shit for other, usually entirely rational, reasons.

    Not so much now as in the past...women largely remain the responsible party in terms of monitoring the health of the relationship. Perhaps what you are seeing is more a balancing of "power," whereby women are FORCING negotiation and cooperation.

    Women are not stupid, anon. We know that the very best outcomes for our children are predicated on the quality of Dad, and his relationship with Mom. And despite economic advances, we know how vulnerable we are once we have children...(we can get tight-assed right quick). For the last...oh what, 300 years?...women's publications have focused pretty much solely on what women should be doing for their husbands and their children.

    That tradition continues today, and generates all kinds of revenue. So no, anon...I'm not buying your "theory." Women continue to seek to please.

Most Active Letters Threads

660

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
437

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
208

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
149

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon