This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 26, 2006 12:00 AM

Thou revealest too much!

Our church group teaches the facts of life to 13-year-olds. One of us goes way over the line.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, April 27, 2006 08:42 AM

    Absolutely clear

    I teach this curriculum at my church, too. Anyone who teaches it is supposed to have gone through a training session that is a minimum of a day and a half long - usually the trainings are two days (Friday night thru Sunday at noon.) The training is VERY clear, and repeats several times, that it is inappropriate to ever discuss details of your own experiences with the kids. _If_ they ask, and only if they ask, it's okay to very generally speak to your own experience. It's never okay to go into details, or to bring it up if they don't ask.

    Thankfully, I have had really great co-teachers when I've taught this curriculum, and we haven't had any real problems with over-sharing. One of my co-teachers tended to recount her experiences being bullied in junior high a little more than I thought was necessary, but our kids are really great, and they expressed sympathy and were able to talk about their own experiences with bullying. (The curriculum is not just about sexuality education, it also focuses on developing communication and relationship skills for all kinds of relationships - at school, with family and friends, etc.)

    Cary is absolutely right in suggesting this problem should be addressed by the co-teachers for the class. I don't think it's likely that the committee related to the curriculum might stop the classes - most of the churches that offer this class have a really strong commitment to it. But bringing it to the committee might mean bringing it up with the whole congregation, which is probably further than it needs to go as a first step. If their congregation has a Director of Religious Education, I'd suggest taking it up with her - she might be helpful as a mediator if the co-teaching group has different feelings on the subject, and she would definitely have the professional experience and skills to deal with this situation politically.

Most Active Letters Threads

370

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
206

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
105

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
54

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon