This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, February 6, 2006 12:00 AM

Hooray, Celexa took my sex drive away!

And now my wife can't manipulate me.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, February 6, 2006 02:31 PM

    Sex IS one of the obligations of marriage

    Not unless you assume that the wife owes him sex, which she does not. At no time EVER do women OWE men sex. Or vice versa. Sex is about desire and love. And if she's not feeling loving or desirous then it is crap to expect it out of her. I don't know where in the world anybody, man or woman, would get off assuming that the world owes them some nookie, but it most certainly does not.

    It is common to read a few words from First Corinthians Chapter 13 ("Love is patient, love is kind....").

    Obviously, these people are pretty far off the mark on love, which is kind of the main issue. But, Chapter 7 of the same book addresses the deliberately withholding of sex:

    The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife's body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control...(NIV)

    I don't want to start a religious war; I hope everyone can get something out of this regardless of their religious orientation. I just think that sex really is a ( mutual) marital obligation (how we hate that word!), and this expresses it pretty elequently in a non-sexist way.

    Of course, it would be cruel to expect sex from a spouse who is puking up blood from the flu or something, and treating one's spouse cruelly is not good for intimacy, but, aside from such reasonable issues, deliberate deprivation by either spouse has historically been considered wrong, and perhaps for good reason.

Most Active Letters Threads

370

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
205

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
104

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
86

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
51

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon