- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
It is really quite simple. The woman is an evil manipulator, based on the premise of the letter. There are 3 rules to any good relationshit or marriage (a useless enterprise designed to enrich women, period): Never use sex, money or children as a weapon. When 1 party uses these as the weapon or a negotiating tool, it is over. There is no turning back. Who in hell wants to be with a woman who uses children and sex as a weapon to negotiate more "things" and money? No one. The advice to give to this fellow is as follows:
1. Keep taking the prescribed medication.
2. Meet with every certified family law attorney that is of significance in his geographic region, pay them a consulting fee and discuss his situation to allow for them to be conflicted out from representing his wife.
3. Select counsel from group in #2 above and plan his exist for at least 6 months to insure proper execution.
4. Do no cheat or run around as regardless of what courts say in that they don't consider adultery when making judicial decisions, they do. Be above reproach.
5. Have this hag served with divorce papers while eating her bran muffins one morning when the plan is complete and ready of execution.
This is how it should be handled. She is useless and he is a fool for marrying such a harpy. In the earlier letters some complete mook made some assinine assertion of the woman "not being satisfied." What a bunch of bullshit. The woman married the man, whether she was satisfied or not, as a means to improve her financial station in life. If she was unsatisfied before it was her choice in the spouse she selected. Don't act like this woman is not capable of reason and that she should not be held accountable, liable and responsible for her choices. She must be, else all this harping about equality is just so much bullshit.
