First, what a searing and lovely response to this letter, Carey.
To those who are using the mantra "it's a dog, not a person" to excuse the mistreatment of an animal, I'd like to respond. Dogs have simpler needs than humans: food, fresh water, fresh air and exercise, and love. If you choose to have a animal (either actively or passively, by entering into a relationship with someone with a pet) it becomes your responsibility to provide for the animal as you would provide for any other being dependent on your for its survival. Because it is an animal does not mean it is less deserving of its basic needs in life.
If you are unable or unwilling to provide for your animal's needs, it is your responsibility to find someone who is able or willing. It's just humanity.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
Salon headlines in your mailbox