This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, June 29, 2009 12:00 AM

A sad defense of marriage

The New York Times reports that couples are surviving infidelity. Should we be celebrating?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 29, 2009 02:42 PM

    "...sticking it out no matter what"

    I'm not being facetious, but isn't this exactly what some promise or vow at the time of entering into the marriage?

    Isn't that a reason? Because you promised to "stick it out", for better or for worse?

    Not sure of the purpose of his promise otherwise.

    Perhaps the point is that this promise/vow should be removed from "traditional" marriage ceremonies (and by traditional, I mean where the couple doesn't write their own vows), as it may be meaningless. Better that one promises to stick it out so long as one remains happy and fulfilled. (Again, not meant as a snark; meant seriously.)

Most Active Letters Threads

684

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
546

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
306

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon