Read other letters about this article
"Defending the institution of marriage by citing the percentage of couples who are able to persevere -- as opposed to the percentage of happy and fulfilled long-term partnerships -- seems pretty cynical."
In all seriousness--how do you justify the premise that any marriage in which a partner was unfaithful cannot be "happy and fulfilled long-term partnerships"?
Sure, many (perhaps most) people believe that infidelity to a spouse is a horrible, terrible thing that destroys everyone involved in a swirling cesspool of some scoundrel's filthy self-gratification.
But surely not EVERYONE feels that way. Is it appropriate to make the assumption that everyone who continues a marriage after someone cheats MUST BE miserable and unfulfilled?
Maybe it's because Sandra Tsing-Loh was miserable and unfulfilled...and her marriage represents 'em all. Is that it?