This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, June 29, 2009 12:00 AM

A sad defense of marriage

The New York Times reports that couples are surviving infidelity. Should we be celebrating?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 29, 2009 02:59 PM

    just to pick a nit

    "Defending the institution of marriage by citing the percentage of couples who are able to persevere -- as opposed to the percentage of happy and fulfilled long-term partnerships -- seems pretty cynical."

    In all seriousness--how do you justify the premise that any marriage in which a partner was unfaithful cannot be "happy and fulfilled long-term partnerships"?

    Sure, many (perhaps most) people believe that infidelity to a spouse is a horrible, terrible thing that destroys everyone involved in a swirling cesspool of some scoundrel's filthy self-gratification.

    But surely not EVERYONE feels that way. Is it appropriate to make the assumption that everyone who continues a marriage after someone cheats MUST BE miserable and unfulfilled?

    Maybe it's because Sandra Tsing-Loh was miserable and unfulfilled...and her marriage represents 'em all. Is that it?

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
412

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
407

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
328

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon