Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

120
Letters
Monday, April 20, 2009 12:00 AM

Would you vote for Eliot Spitzer?

The disgraced New York governor is planting the seeds for a comeback, but in a Newsweek interview he shows no signs of answering for his spectacular hypocrisy.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, April 20, 2009 12:52 PM

I would vote for him

Same thing I tell small children "Hypocrisy exists, get used to it and stop being an insufferable twit about it."

We don't elect these people because they're saints you know.

Monday, April 20, 2009 12:57 PM

Salon Readers, please don't be mad at me...

but I initially read this line:

in which he was identified as Client no. 9 in a prostitution ring bust

as this:

in which he was identified as Clinton no. 9 in a prostitution ring bust

.

I can't stop giggling.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:00 PM

Even Jesus lived with a hooker

Why would expect a higher standard of politicians?

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:03 PM

Them and us

It is just silly that we want to cast out politicians for doing things that the rest of us do every day. If Spitzer was caught smoking weed he would have been cast out despite the fact that millions of Americans do it every day. The guy paid for sex, not very classy but it is the worlds oldest profession so why do we claim to be shocked?

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:05 PM

What Great Badger said!!

Rebecca, get the hell over it! Guys like Abe Lincoln, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr. couldn't succeed today with voters like you around.

No, Spitzer isn't anywhere NEAR any of those guys, that's not the point. I'm a feminist too and I don't care for what Spitzer did but I never expect even the best politicians to be free of moral or political hypocrisy. The simple fact is that Spitzer's career was cut short deliberately because he was making enemies in high places, incl. the Bush administration.

THAT'S THE ONLY REASON HE WAS CUT DOWN AS A POLITICAL FIGURE.

He was doing a very good job going after the right people on Wall Street. HE'S the guy who should be Obama's economic advisor, not corrupt looters like Summers, Geithner and Gensler who are all busy helping their Wall Street buddies.

Obama's administration ought to be called the Goldman Sachs administration. It's a disgrace. Spitzer's brash, fearless, arrogant approach toward the corrupt, greedy kings of finance is exactly what this country needs.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:05 PM

In a heartbeat.

Spitzer's a hero. SEC's mishandling of the whistleblowing preceding the Madoff scandal illustrates that competence and dogged determination cannot and should not be taken for granted.

I could give a flying fuck about his sex life, pun intended.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:12 PM

Uh

Traister believes politicians should have a private sex life but is bothered by Spitzer's hypocrisy.

Who's the real hypocrite here?

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:12 PM

yes

yes yes

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:13 PM

Yes, Myself and rest of America love voting for womanizers.

Voting for womanizers is not a new thing. Even voting for whore mongers. Here is a list of Presidents and elected executive that were womanizers and were voted into office multiple times:

FDR, long time affair with someone that wasn't Elizabeth.

JFK.

Clinton.

LA Mayor Villiagrosa.

The SF major, Gavin Newsom.

NY Governor Patterson.

House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Senator David Vitter.

This list is not exhaustive.

So ... why all the hate on Spitzer? Polygamous men are popular and electable. If women really didn't like polygamous men, they would stop sleeping with them.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:13 PM

I'd vote for him.

Prostitution/solicitation are crimes in the same way jaywalking or speeding is a crime. IMHO they shouldn't be illegal at all. He's like MLK, breaking the law for a higher good.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:14 PM

yes

I couldn't give less of a shit about his zipper problem.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:20 PM

He was taken out by a politicized Justice Dept

Ever ask yourself why the feds were involved in a common prostitution case? It involved no public money, he paid for the prostitute with his own money.

He, also, never was charged. They just leaked it to the press.

I think Spitzer was taken out by a politically-corrupted DOJ.

We need him!

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:20 PM

I'd vote for him

If we lived anywhere else in the developed world, no one would give a crap that the guy had cheated on his wife. If we lived in a more sensible world to begin with, prostitution would be legal - and regulated, and he would never have committed the "crime" that makes him apparently guilty of hypocrisy.

The fact remains that Spitzer, whether or not we like him as a person, is one of the few politicians who was willing to stand up to Wall Street and corporate corruption long before most of us had any idea what was going to happen to the economy. He has good ideas and a good work ethic. Why not elect him again?

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:22 PM

Devil is in the details

If his cheating scenario had taken place with an age-appropriate (or at least similarly educated and intelligent) colleague under covertly opportune circumstances, maybe. It's the whole context of deliberate tackiness that is so disgusting this this case; he sought the services of the "VIP Club," hiring a prostitute not much older than his daughters, transported her to DC, and was combative in the use of condoms. These details are indicative of a very disturbing personality.

Just imagine if you were one of his daughters. His message to them is, "don't bother going to college. Just maintain your tits and ass and you will go far." I mean, if their own father resorted to such a grandiose, tasteless measures for his own indiscretion, how are they supposed to proceed in romance?

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:24 PM

Missing the point.

A lot of these responsies seem to miss the point. Was Spitzer having an affair? Yeah, he was. We all get that, who the fuck cares?

But his 'affair' was witha prostitute, a sort of crime he made a career out of fighting. Plus, he spent huge sums of money on it.

All the other affairs people bring up were sleazy, but perfectly legal and harmless to the public, but Spitzer used tax-payer money to commit a crime...and rather stupidly, a crime he could have committed just as well for a -LOT- less money.

He managed to show off both legal-hypocrisy, and financial idiocy in one act. Most politicians can keep sins, crimes and financial blunders seperated across multiple acts. Kinda gotta question the leadership of a guy who manages all three at the same time.

Monday, April 20, 2009 01:25 PM

Worth the price?

But in seriousness, I'm curious to know what Broadsheet readers think about Spitzer and his hypothetical political future. Would you vote for him?

Well gosh, looking back, which would we rather have had this past year?

A governor who was able to take on the finance sector and win, even if he was a hypocrite?

Or the satisfaction of righteous purity ... and the bankers get away with everything scot-free? (Which is what we got.)

In a sense the recession is the bill we all have to pay for the luxury of years and years of willful ignorance and civic disinterest, for preferring to obsess about political soap opera over policy. In that sense, Spitzer is just another line item.

So you tell us, Rebecca Traister (and everyone else who was so glad to see him go down): what do you think? How do you like the price tag that came with righteous indignation? Are things going the way you wanted? Was it worth it?

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
573

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
309

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon